Can anyone really be talking about ethically modifying human nature

In Julian Savulescu & Nick Bostrom (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press. pp. 25--42 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Following human nature.Nathan Kowalsky - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (2):165-183.
Human nature and enhancement.Allen Buchanan - 2008 - Bioethics 23 (3):141-150.
Nature Talk – Nature Talking?Abraham Olivier - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 19:129-139.
Ethically evaluating land art: Is it worth it?Sheila Lintott - 2007 - Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (3):263 – 277.
Talking about intentional objects.Michael Gorman - 2006 - Dialectica 60 (2):135-144.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
28 (#570,908)

6 months
1 (#1,474,534)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Human Nature: The Very Idea.Tim Lewens - 2012 - Philosophy and Technology 25 (4):459-474.
Robotic Nudges for Moral Improvement through Stoic Practice.Michał Klincewicz - 2019 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 23 (3):425-455.
Is human enhancement intrinsically bad?Karolina Kudlek - 2021 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 24 (2):269-279.
Reproductive Choice, Enhancement, and the Moral Continuum Argument.E. Malmqvist - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (1):41-54.
A Thomistic appraisal of human enhancement technologies.Jason T. Eberl - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (4):289-310.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references