- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On Cauchy's notion of infinitesimal
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (3):375-378 (1988)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Burgessian Critique of Nominalistic Tendencies in Contemporary Mathematics and its Historiography.Karin Usadi Katz & Mikhail G. Katz - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (1):51-89.
Infinitesimal chances and the laws of nature.Adam Elga - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):67 – 76.
Numerical point of view on Calculus for functions assuming finite, infinite, and infinitesimal values over finite, infinite, and infinitesimal domains.Yaroslav Sergeyev - 2009 - Nonlinear Analysis Series A 71 (12):e1688-e1707.
Developments in constructive nonstandard analysis.Erik Palmgren - 1998 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):233-272.
A new applied approach for executing computations with infinite and infinitesimal quantities.Yaroslav D. Sergeyev - 2008 - Informatica 19 (4):567-596.
Los infinitesimales como ficciones útiles para Leibniz: La polémica en la academia de parís (the infinitesimals as useful fictions for Leibniz: The controversy in the Paris academy of sciences).Femando Joven - 1997 - Theoria 12 (2):257-279.
Blinking fractals and their quantitative analysis using infinite and infinitesimal numbers.Yaroslav Sergeyev - 2007 - Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 33 (1):50-75.
Who Gave You the Cauchy–Weierstrass Tale? The Dual History of Rigorous Calculus.Alexandre Borovik & Mikhail G. Katz - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (3):245-276.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
221 (#91,662)
6 months
16 (#158,534)
2009-01-28
Downloads
221 (#91,662)
6 months
16 (#158,534)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Tools, Objects, and Chimeras: Connes on the Role of Hyperreals in Mathematics.Vladimir Kanovei, Mikhail G. Katz & Thomas Mormann - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (2):259-296.
Who Gave You the Cauchy–Weierstrass Tale? The Dual History of Rigorous Calculus.Alexandre Borovik & Mikhail G. Katz - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (3):245-276.
A Burgessian Critique of Nominalistic Tendencies in Contemporary Mathematics and its Historiography.Karin Usadi Katz & Mikhail G. Katz - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (1):51-89.
Ten Misconceptions from the History of Analysis and Their Debunking.Piotr Błaszczyk, Mikhail G. Katz & David Sherry - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (1):43-74.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-rskd8 uwo