Pseudodiagnosticity revisited

, &
Psychological Review 116 (4):971-985 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/a0017050

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On the conjunction fallacy and the meaning of and, yet again: A reply to.Katya Tentori & Vincenzo Crupi - 2012 - Cognition 122 (2):123-134.
A Second Look at the Logic of Explanatory Power (with Two Novel Representation Theorems).Vincenzo Crupi & Katya Tentori - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (3):365-385.
Why quantum probability does not explain the conjunction fallacy.Katya Tentori & Vincenzo Crupi - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):308-310.
Comparison of confirmation measures.Katya Tentori, Vincenzo Crupi, Nicolao Bonini & Daniel Osherson - 2007 - Cognition 103 (1):107-119.
State of the field: Measuring information and confirmation.Vincenzo Crupi & Katya Tentori - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47:81-90.
Updating: Learning versus supposing.Jiaying Zhao, Vincenzo Crupi, Katya Tentori, Branden Fitelson & Daniel Osherson - 2012 - Cognition 124 (3):373-378.
Noisy probability judgment, the conjunction fallacy, and rationality: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).Vincenzo Crupi & Katya Tentori - 2016 - Psychological Review 123 (1):97-102.
Irrelevant conjunction: Statement and solution of a new paradox.Vincenzo Crupi & Katya Tentori - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (1):1-13.
Models of rationality and the psychology of reasoning: From is to ought, and back.Crupi Vincenzo & Vittorio Girotto - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
The pseudodiagnosticity trap: Should participants consider alternative hypotheses?Gernot D. Kleiter, Michael E. Doherty & Ryan D. Tweney - 2010 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (4):332-345.
On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: Probability versus inductive confirmation.Katya Tentori, Vincenzo Crupi & Selena Russo - 2013 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142 (1):235.
Confirmation as partial entailment: A representation theorem in inductive logic.Vincenzo Crupi & Katya Tentori - 2013 - Journal of Applied Logic 11 (4):364-372.
On Three Measures of Explanatory Power with Axiomatic Representations.Michael P. Cohen - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4):1077-1089.
The influence of feedback and diagnostic data on pseudodiagnosticity.Michael E. Doherty, Michael B. Schiavo, Ryan D. Tweney & Clifford R. Mynatt - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 18 (4):191-194.
Erratum to “Confirmation as partial entailment” [Journal of Applied Logic 11 364–372].Vincenzo Crupi & Katya Tentori - 2014 - Journal of Applied Logic 12 (2):230-231.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
13 (#1,039,189)

6 months
4 (#795,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Katya Tentori
Vincenzo Crupi
Università degli Studi di Torino

Citations of this work

Rational Polarization.Kevin Dorst - 2023 - Philosophical Review 132 (3):355-458.
Being Rational and Being Wrong.Kevin Dorst - 2023 - Philosophers' Imprint 23 (1).
State of the field: Measuring information and confirmation.Vincenzo Crupi & Katya Tentori - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47:81-90.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references