The eternity of the world and the distinction between creation and conservation

Religious Studies 42 (4):403-416 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to an important set of medieval arguments, it is impossible to make a distinction between creation and conservation on the assumption of a beginningless universe. The argument is that, on such an assumption, either God is never causally sufficient for the existence of the universe, or, if He is at one time causally sufficient for the existence of the universe, He is at all times causally sufficient for the universe, and occasionalism is true. I defend the claim that these arguments are successful. Since Christian theology requires a distinction between creation and conservation, arguments in favour of the possible eternity of the world fail.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
109 (#161,822)

6 months
9 (#307,343)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Cross
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

The divine attributes.Nicholas Everitt - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):78-90.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references