Philosophy and Historical Meaning

In John Shand (ed.), A Companion to Nineteenth‐Century Philosophy. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. pp. 261–280 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter discusses that Friedrich Schleiermacher and Wilhelm Dilthey are united by a shared conviction that historical reality is the proper domain of philosophical inquiry. In their view, Kant's critical philosophy had effectively foreclosed the traditional enterprise of metaphysics. Rather than viewing this as a loss, however, both Schleiermacher and Dilthey took the Kantian revolution as a cue to make historical reality, as opposed to an ahistorical domain of transcendent entities, an independent field of investigation. The chapter articulates their basic philosophical orientation and its enduring significance by examining two domains about which they thought deeply: philosophy of religion and ethics. In the case of Dilthey, whose work is less well known in Anglophone philosophy, the chapter also frames the discussion with an examination of his more general intellectual project, which he labeled the “Critique of Historical Reason”.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ritschl's Critique of Schleiermacher's Theological Ethics.James M. Brandt - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):51 - 72.
Schleiermacher and the transmission of sin.Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt - 2022 - TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 7 (2).
Knowledge and Reality in the Historical Epistemology.Ilya T. Kasavin - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (2):6-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
4 (#1,625,946)

6 months
3 (#980,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references