Ethical regulation and humanities research in Australia: Problems and consequences

Monash Bioethics Review 23 (3):S39-S57 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that recent ethics research guidelines fit poorly onto the kinds of research undertaken in the humanities, where a research conversation often forms a distinctive method of investigation that has no scientific equivalent The NH&MRC ethics guidelines pay little attention to the issues raised in humanities and social science research. Also, ethics committees are constituted primarily to look at ethical issues that arise from medical and scientific research, causing extra problems for those in the humanities and social sciences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The problems with forbidding science.Gary E. Marchant & Lynda L. Pope - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):375-394.
Scientific self-regulation—so good, how can it fail?Patrick L. Taylor - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):395-406.
Assessing empirical research in bioethics.Baruch A. Brody - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (3).
On ethical, social and environmental management systems.Antonio Argandoña - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 51 (1):41-52.
Regulation and the social licence for medical research.Mary Dixon-Woods & Richard E. Ashcroft - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (4):381-391.
What is special about the ethical issues in online research?Dag Elgesem - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):195-203.
The Regulation of Technology.Mary Warnock - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (2):173-175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-09

Downloads
10 (#1,201,046)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?