The new b-theory's tu quoque argument

Synthese 107 (2):249 - 269 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explanatory priority: Transitive and unequivocal, a reply to William Craig.William Hasker - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):389-393.
Rationality and the tu quoque argument.Joseph Agassi - 1973 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 16 (1-4):395 – 406.
I. Agassi on rationality.Robert E. Innis - 1975 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):97 – 101.
A user’s guide to the evolutionary argument against naturalism.Omar Mirza - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (2):125 - 146.
Tu Quoque.Roger Teichmann - 1987 - Analysis 47 (4):199 - 201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
128 (#141,927)

6 months
6 (#510,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Lane Craig
Houston Baptist University

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Situations and attitudes.Jon Barwise & John Perry - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (11):668-691.
Situations and Attitudes.Jon Barwise & John Perry - 1983 - Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Edited by John Perry.

View all 45 references / Add more references