Social Representations and Individual Actions: Misunderstandings, Omissions and Different Premises

Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 25 (3):285-293 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wolfgang Wagner has submitted a logically ordered and well phrased chain of arguments. But his paper contains, at least in concern of our research which he uses for illustration , a number of misinterpretations. Furthermore, and what is more important, it ignores relevant scientific developments and tries to monopolize the field of social representations for one single, namely Wagner's own, viewpoint and level of analysis.1 For these reasons, I can not accept some of his statements.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is a Causal Theorist to Do about Omissions?Rebekah L. H. Rice - 2011 - Modern Schoolman 88 (1-2):123-144.
Ability and responsibility for omissions.Randolph Clarke - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 73 (2-3):195 - 208.
Responsibility, control, and omissions.John Martin Fischer - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (1):45-64.
Hegel.Robert E. Wood - 2012 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):337-349.
Omissions as possibilities.Sara Bernstein - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (1):1-23.
Kristeva’s Sadomasochistic Subject and the Sublimation of Violence.Kelly Oliver - 2013 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 21 (1):13-26.
Being in the world.Joseph Raz - 2010 - Ratio 23 (4):433-452.
Intention and Motor Representation in Purposive Action.Stephen Andrew Butterfill & Corrado Sinigaglia - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1):119-145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
26 (#628,186)

6 months
2 (#1,250,897)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?