Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models

, &
Cognition 170 (C):280-297 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.012

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Surprisingly rational: Probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.Fintan Costello & Paul Watts - 2014 - Psychological Review 121 (3):463-480.
Noisy probability judgment, the conjunction fallacy, and rationality: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).Vincenzo Crupi & Katya Tentori - 2016 - Psychological Review 123 (1):97-102.
The rationality of different kinds of intuitive decision processes.Marc Jekel, Andreas Glöckner, Susann Fiedler & Arndt Bröder - 2012 - Synthese 189 (S1):147-160.
Comments on Quantum Probability Theory.Steven Sloman - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):47-52.
The Collapsing Choice Theory: Dissociating Choice and Judgment in Decision Making. [REVIEW]Jeffrey M. Stibel, Itiel E. Dror & Talia Ben-Zeev - 2009 - Theory and Decision 66 (2):149-179.
Imprecise Probability and Higher Order Vagueness.Susanne Rinard - 2017 - Res Philosophica 94 (2):257-273.
Effect of probability of competing responses in probabilistic verbal acquisition.Mathew Erdelyi, Barbara Watts & James F. Voss - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4):323.
More about judgment and reason.Harold I. Brown - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (5):646-651.
Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning.Philip Johnson-Laird, Paolo Legrenzi, Vittorio Girotto, Maria Sonino Legrenzi & Jean-Paul Caverni - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (1):62-88.
Confirmation in the Cognitive Sciences: The Problematic Case of Bayesian Models. [REVIEW]Frederick Eberhardt & David Danks - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (3):389-410.
Who will catch the Nagami Fever? Causal inferences and probability judgment in mental models of diseases.Manfred Thiiring & Helmut Jungermann - 1992 - In D. A. Evans & V. L. Patel (eds.), Advanced Models of Cognition for Medical Training and Practice. Springer. pp. 97--307.
Extrapolating human probability judgment.Daniel Osherson, Edward E. Smith, Tracy S. Myers, Eldar Shafir & Michael Stob - 1994 - Theory and Decision 36 (2):103-129.
Ending the Rationality Wars: How to Make Disputes about Human Rationality Disappear.Richard Samuels, Stephen Stich & Michael Bishop - 2002 - In Renee Elio (ed.), Common Sense, Reasoning and Rationality. Oxford University Press. pp. 236-268.
Transversal Rationality, Rhetoric, and the Imagination: Probability and Contingency in Experience and Judgment.R. E. Ramsey - 1998 - Analecta Husserliana 53:97-108.
Normative models in psychology are here to stay.Keith E. Stanovich - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):268-269.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-06

Downloads
28 (#572,733)

6 months
4 (#798,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the psychology of prediction.Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky - 1973 - Psychological Review 80 (4):237-251.
Heuristic decision making.Gerd Gigerenzer & Wolfgang Gaissmaier - 2011 - Annual Review of Psychology 62:451-482.
A law of comparative judgment.L. L. Thurstone - 1927 - Psychological Review 34 (4):273-286.

View all 15 references / Add more references