Objectivism and subjectivism in the foundations of statistics

Erkenntnis 31 (2-3):387 - 396 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The difference between carnap's and de finetti's conceptions of probability does not consist of a couple of requirements, As carnap asserted in a letter to de finetti. The paper is intended to give a theoretical justification for this denial. In order to do this, The author stresses the difference between (tolerant) objectivism and (radical) subjectivism. The difference is discussed in statistical terms. The discussion is faced with respect to predictive inferences, A type of statistical inference that both carnap and de finetti advocate in many occasions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Colours.J. J. C. Smart - 1961 - Philosophy 36 (April-July):128-142.
Intention and Permissibility.Amir Saemi - 2009 - Ethical Perspectives 16 (1):81-101.
Can color be reduced to anything?Don Dedrick - 1996 - Philosophy of Science Supplement 3 (3):134-42.
An objectivist's guide to subjectivism about color.Frank Jackson & Robert Pargetter - 1987 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 41 (1):127-141.
Gödel, Kant, and the Path of a Science.Srećko Kovač - 2008 - Inquiry: Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):147-169.
Subjectivism and objectivism in the social sciences.Alan Gewirth - 1954 - Philosophy of Science 21 (2):157-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#443,492)

6 months
6 (#585,724)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The relevance quotient.Domenico Costantani - 1979 - Erkenntnis 14 (2):149 - 157.

Add more references