Explanation-based interpretation of open-textured concepts in logical models of legislation

Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (3):191-208 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we discuss a view of the Machine Learning technique called Explanation-Based Learning (EBL) or Explanation-Based Generalization (EBG) as a process for the interpretation of vague concepts in logic-based models of law.The open-textured nature of legal terms is a well-known open problem in the building of knowledge-based legal systems. EBG is a technique which creates generalizations of given examples on the basis of background domain knowledge. We relate these two topics by considering EBG''s domain knowledge as corresponding to statute law rules, and EBG''s training example as corresponding to a precedent case.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

CHIRON: Planning in an open-textured domain. [REVIEW]Kathryn E. Sanders - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (4):225-269.
Isomorphism and legal knowledge based systems.T. J. M. Bench-Capon & F. P. Coenen - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):65-86.
Commonsense causal explanation in a legal domain.Rinke Hoekstra & Joost Breuker - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (3):281-299.
Formalizing multiple interpretation of legal knowledge.Andreas Hamfelt - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (4):221-265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#417,943)

6 months
4 (#778,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The concept of law.Hla Hart - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
Foundations of Logic Programming.J. W. Lloyd - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (1):288-289.

View all 7 references / Add more references