Human Sentiment and the Future of Wildlife

Environmental Values 2 (4):335 - 346 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Identifying what is wrong with the demise of wildlife requires prior identification of the human sentiment which is offended by that demise. Attempts to understand this in terms of animal rights (individual or species) and the benefits of wildlife to human beings or the wider environment are rejected. A diagnosis of this sentiment is attempted in terms of our increasing admiration, in the conditions of modernity and postmodernity, for the 'harmony' or 'at homeness' of wild animals with their environments. The diagnosis is defended against certain misunderstandings, and implications are tentatively drawn from it for environmental education and the management of wildlife

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Means and Ends in Wild Life Management.Aldo Leopold - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (4):329-332.
The Medical Treatment of Wild Animals.Robert W. Loftin - 1985 - Environmental Ethics 7 (3):231-239.
Foundations of wildlife protection attitudes.Eugene C. Hargrove - 1987 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 30 (1 & 2):3 – 31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
21 (#752,853)

6 months
4 (#837,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Cooper
Durham University

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.

Add more references