Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes [Book Review]

International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):115-116 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00190365

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Receptions of Descartes: Cartesianism and Anti-Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe.Tad M. Schmaltz (ed.) - 2005 - Routledge.
Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes (review).Richard A. Watson - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (3):415-416.
Tad M. Schmaltz, Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes Reviewed by.Byron Williston - 2003 - Philosophy in Review 23 (4):282-284.
The reception of cartesianism.John Henry - 2013 - In Peter R. Anstey (ed.), The Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the seventeenth century. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 116.
The Reception of Descartes in the Seventeenth-Century Scottish Universities: Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy.Giovanni Gellera - 2015 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 13 (3):179-201.
Early Modern Cartesianisms: Dutch and French Constructions.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2016 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press USA.
Radical Cartesian Politics: Van Velthuysen, De la Court, and Spinoza.Tammy Nyden - 1999 - Studia Spinozana: An International and Interdisciplinary Series 15:35-65.
The Philosophy of Robert Forbes: A Scottish Scholastic Response to Cartesianism.Giovanni Gellera - 2013 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 11 (2):191-211.
Review of Tad M. Schmaltz, Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes. [REVIEW]Peter Anstey - 2003 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (2).
Review: Tad Schmaltz, (ed.), Receptions of Descartes: Cartesianism and anti-Cartesianism in early modern Europe. Routledge, 2005. [REVIEW]John Cottingham - unknown
Cartesianism and its Feminist Promise and Limits: The Case of Mary Astell.Karen Detlefsen - 2017 - In Stephen Gaukroger & Catherine Wilson (eds.), Descartes and Cartesianism: Essays in Honour of Desmond Clarke. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Descartes Reinvented.Tom Sorell - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
“Cogitor ergo sum”: On the meaning and relevance of Baader's theological critique of Descartes.Joris Geldhof - 2005 - Modern Theology 21 (2):237-251.
Descartes Reinvented (review).Dennis Des Chene - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):498-499.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
8 (#1,313,626)

6 months
7 (#421,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John J. Conley
Loyola University Maryland

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references