Art and religion: Inverting the primacy

Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 6 (2):74-77 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On the basis of the conception of aesthetic imagination derived from evolutionary psychology, cognitive psychology, and social cognitive neuroscience, today it is possible - and more appropriate - to invert the traditional view of anthropologists and archeologists that conceives the arts (from the early pre-historic arts) as mere instruments supporting religious beliefs, practices, and rituals.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Early art and the evolution of grounded emotions.Gianluca Consoli - 2015 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 8 (1):147-156.
What is Evolutionary Aesthetics for?Roberta Dreon - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (2):95-111.
“Aesthetic Primitives”: Fundamental Biological Elements of a Naturalistic Aesthetics.Ellen Dissanayake - 2015 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 8 (1):6-24.
Moving Imagination.Helena de Preester (ed.) - 2013 - Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Public art aesthetics and psychological healing.Rong Hu - 2023 - HTS Theological Studies 79 (1):9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-15

Downloads
232 (#90,110)

6 months
44 (#95,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How to Be a Pessimist about Aesthetic Testimony.Robert Hopkins - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy 108 (3):138-157.
Art and Intimacy: How the Arts Began.Ellen Dissanayake - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (1):69-71.
Art and Intimacy.Ellen Dissanayake - 2000 - University of Washington Press.

Add more references