Human Emotions and Fallible Judgments

Journal of Speculative Philosophy 35 (3):289-303 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author argues that Peirce, James, and Dewey propose a version of emotional cognitivism. He goes on to highlight certain features of human emotions, conceived in this light, above all emotional reflexivity. Given the highly fallible character of our emotional judgments, the reference to the “I,” in addition to that to the object, can hardly be overlooked. Deliberative agents are wise to confess, “I am angry,” without eliminating what James identifies as “the intensely objective reference” of such feelings as fear, anger, and rapture.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Feelings and Emotional Evaluation.Timothy P. Bloser - 2004 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Democratic values, emotions and emotivism.Bojan Vranic - 2016 - Filozofija I Društvo 27 (4):723-738.
Alienated Emotions and Self-Knowledge.Krista Thomason - 2023 - In Alba Montes Sánchez & Alessandro Salice (eds.), Emotional Self-Knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 39-55.
Emotional Cognitivism without Representationalism.Dave Beisecker - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 1 (1):113-122.
Beyond the Basics: The Evolution and Development of Human Emotions.Robyn Bluhm - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (sup1):73-94.
Moral Emotions.Ronald de Sousa - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (2):109 - 126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
7 (#1,410,679)

6 months
4 (#862,849)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vincent Colapietro
Pennsylvania State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references