Evolutionary naturalism and the objectivity of morality

Biology and Philosophy 8 (1):47-60 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We propose an objective and justifiable ethics that is contingent on the truth of evolutionary theory. We do not argue for the truth of this position, which depends on the empirical question of whether moral functions form a natural class, but for its cogency and possibility. The position we propose combines the advantages of Kantian objectivity with the explanatory and motivational advantages of moral naturalism. It avoids problems with the epistemological inaccessibility of transcendent values, while avoiding the relativism or subjectivism often associated with moral naturalism. Our position emerges out of criticisms of the contemporary sociobiological views of morality found in the writings of Richard Alexander, Michael Ruse, and Robert Richards.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
116 (#154,064)

6 months
14 (#179,748)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

John Collier
University of KwaZulu-Natal
Michael Stingl
University of Lethbridge

Citations of this work

Can biology make ethics objective?Richmond Campbell - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (1):21-31.
Parting with illusions in evolutionary ethics.David C. Lahti - 2003 - Biology and Philosophy 18 (5):639-651.
Naturalisms in philosophy of mind.Steven Horst - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):219-254.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral realism.Peter Railton - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (2):163-207.
The nature of morality: an introduction to ethics.Gilbert Harman - 1977 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references