Conjoining meanings without losing our heads

Mind and Language 35 (2):224-236 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper has two principal aims. First, Pietroski's sparse account of semantic composition will be favourably compared to the familiar full Frege hierarchy of composed semantic types. Second, I shall introduce the idea of a head as employed in linguistics and pose the problem of how to square Pietroski's compositional principles with the asymmetry entailed by headedness. The paper will leave the problem of headedness as an outstanding issue to be resolved.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Responses to comments on Conjoining meanings.Paul Pietroski - 2020 - Mind and Language 35 (2):266-273.
Sleeping Beauty in a grain of rice.David Haig - 2016 - Biology and Philosophy 31 (1):23-37.
The eternal Coin: A puzzle about self-locating conditional credence.Cian Dorr - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):189-205.
Modern Zen and Psychoanalysis: The Semantic Connection.Rossa Ó Muireartaigh - 2016 - European Journal of Japanese Philosophy 1:189-202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-10

Downloads
57 (#281,804)

6 months
4 (#795,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Languages and language.David K. Lewis - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 3-35.
Conjoining Meanings: Semantics Without Truth Values.Paul M. Pietroski - 2018 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Events and semantic architecture.Paul M. Pietroski - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Unity of Linguistic Meaning.John Collins - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

Add more references