Biosemiotic Literary Criticism: Genesis and Prospectus

Springer Verlag (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This volume is based to a large extent on the understanding of biosemiotic literary criticism as a semiotic-model-making enterprise. For Jurij Lotman and Thomas A. Sebeok, “nature writing is essentially a model of the relationship between humans and nature” ; biosemiotic literary criticism, itself a form of nature writing and thus itself an ecological-niche-making enterprise, will be considered to be a model of modeling, a model of nature naturing. Modes and models of analysis drawn from Thomas A. Sebeok and Marcel Danesi’s Forms of Meaning: Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotic Analysis as well as from Timo Maran’s work on “modeling the environment in literature,” Edwina Taborsky’s writing on Peircean semiosis, and, of course, Jesper Hoffmeyer’s formative work in biosemiotics are among the most important organizing elements for this volume.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Response Of The Mainland China To The Western Feminist Literary Criticism.Shu-Ming Lin - 2009 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2:21-28.
Literary critics in a new era.Martin Paulsen - 2008 - Studies in East European Thought 60 (3):251 - 260.
Leavis, literary criticism and philosophy.Peter Byrne - 1979 - British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (3):263-273.
Coherence, Literary and Epistemic.Charles Repp - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (1):59-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-09

Downloads
8 (#1,324,759)

6 months
6 (#531,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references