- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What Can She Know?: Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (2):495-496 (1994)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
What Can She Know?: Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge.Lorraine Code (ed.) - 1991 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge.Lorraine Code, Sandra Harding & Susan Hekman - 1993 - Hypatia 8 (3):202-210.
What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge.Claudia Card - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (3):662.
Code, Lorraine: "What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge.". [REVIEW]Diana Helena Maffía - 1992 - Cuadernos de Filosofía 23 (38):77.
Feminist Communication Theory: A Semiotic Phenomenological Explication of Feminist Academic Theorizing.Jacqueline Marie Martinez - 1992 - Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Space, gender, knowledge: feminist readings.Linda McDowell & Joanne P. Sharp (eds.) - 1997 - New York: J. Wiley.
What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge.L. Hankinson Nelson - 1994 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24 (2):295-326.
What Can She Know? [REVIEW]Lynn Hankinson Nelson - 1994 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24 (2):295-326.
Women, knowledge, and reality: explorations in feminist philosophy.Ann Garry & Marilyn Pearsall (eds.) - 1996 - New York: Routledge.
Revisioning the political: feminist reconstructions of traditional concepts in western political theory.Nancy J. Hirschmann & Christine Di Stefano (eds.) - 1996 - Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
An Introduction to Feminist Epistemologies.Alessandra Tanesini - 1999 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Social construction as grounding; or: fundamentality for feminists, a reply to Barnes and Mikkola.Jonathan Schaffer - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (10):2449-2465.
Scientific knowledge and its situatedness versus its objectivity (problems of situated knowledge in feminist epistemology).E. Farkasova - 2002 - Filozofia 57 (6):383-392.
Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy.Ann Garry & Marilyn Pearsall (eds.) - 1989 - New York: Routledge.
Undoing Theory: The "Transgender Question" and the Epistemic Violence of Anglo-American Feminist Theory.Viviane Namaste - 2008 - Hypatia 24 (3):11 - 32.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-03-18
Downloads
82 (#205,253)
6 months
9 (#312,765)
2012-03-18
Downloads
82 (#205,253)
6 months
9 (#312,765)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Authority of the Fallacies Approach to Argument Evaluation.Catherine Hundleby - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (3):279-308.
Whose social values? Evaluating Canada’s ‘death of evidence’ controversy.Maya J. Goldenberg - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):404-424.
Authority arguments in academic contexts in social studies and humanities.Begona Carrascal & Catherine E. Hundleby - 2011 - Ossa Conference Archive.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-rskd8 uwo