Abstract

The author notes that "it might strike some readers as mildly incredible that Nietzsche incorporated in his writings anything as staid and proper as an ontology or epistemology". At the same time he vigorously denies that there is anything staid about these aspects of Nietzsche’s thought. They do not qualify but underline its thoroughgoing "radicality." Nietzsche’s "theory of knowledge" stands up to scrutiny precisely because Nietzsche is not, as Heidegger and implicitly others would have it, the "last metaphysician."