A test of the argument engagement model in Romania

Abstract

Hample, Paglieri, and Na’s model of argument engagement proposes that people en-gage in arguments when they perceive the benefits of arguing to be greater than the costs of doing so. This paper tests the model in Romania, a different culture than the one in which the model was developed, by using a 2 x 2 design.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Toulmin’s “Analytic Arguments”.Ben Hamby - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (1):116-131.
Corporate Citizenship and Stakeholder Engagement: Maintaining an Equitable Power Balance.Bethel Ihugba & Onyeka Osuji - 2011 - Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 16 (2):28-38.
Story Similarity in Arguments from Analogy.Douglas Walton - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (2):190-221.
Putnam's model-theoretic argument(s). A detailed reconstruction.Jürgen Dümont - 1999 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (2):341-364.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
27 (#594,564)

6 months
9 (#320,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?