The Notion of an Ideal Audience in Legal Argument (TREVOR JM BENCH-CAPON)

Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):59-71 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

George C. Christie, the notion of an ideal audience in legal argument.Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):59-71.
Argument in artificial intelligence and law.Trevor Bench-Capon - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (4):249-261.
An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application.Alison Chorley & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (3-4):323-371.
Zenon Bankowski, Ian White, and Ulrike Hahn, Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning.Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (4):363-365.
Luuk matthijssen: Interfacing between lawyers and computers: An architecture for knowledge-based interfaces to legal databases. [REVIEW]Trevor Bench-Capon - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (4):349-352.
Argumentation in AI and law: Editors' introduction. [REVIEW]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon & Paul E. Dunne - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):1-8.
Try to see it my way: Modelling persuasion in legal discourse. [REVIEW]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (4):271-287.
The missing link revisited: The role of teleology in representing legal argument. [REVIEW]T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):79-94.
Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues.Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon & Douglas Walton - 2013 - Argument and Computation 4 (2):105-127.
Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law.Trevor Bench-Capon & Henry Prakken - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (2):153-174.
Argument based machine learning applied to law.Martin Možina, Jure Žabkar, Trevor Bench-Capon & Ivan Bratko - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):53-73.
Strategies for question selection in argumentative dialogues about plans.Rolando Medellin-Gasque, Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon & Peter McBurney - 2013 - Argument and Computation 4 (2):151-179.
A comparison of four ontologies for the design of legal knowledge systems.Pepijn R. S. Visser & Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon - 1998 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 6 (1):27-57.
Book review: Bram Roth, case-based reasoning in the law: A formal theory of reasoning by case comparison. Ph. D. thesis, the university of maastricht, 2003. 181 pp. [REVIEW]Trevor Bench-Capon - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (3):227-229.
The conception of audience in Perelman and Isocrates: Locating the ideal in the real. [REVIEW]David Douglas Dunlap - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (4):461-474.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

HYPO's legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (2):205-250.
Accommodating change.Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (4):409-427.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references