The Michigan BioTrust for Health: Using Dried Bloodspots for Research to Benefit the Community While Respecting the Individual

, , , &
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (s1):98-101 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Michigan Department of Community Health stores almost 4 million dried blood spot specimens in the Michigan Neonatal Biobank. DBS are collected from newborns under a mandatory public health program to screen for serious conditions. At 24 to 36 hours of age, a few drops of blood are taken from the baby’s heel and placed on a filter paper card. The card is sent to the state public health laboratory for testing. After testing, MDCH retains the spots indefinitely for the personal use of the patient and also, pursuant to a 2000 law, for possible research.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00577.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Michigan BioTrust for Health: Using Dried Bloodspots for Research to Benefit the Community While Respecting the Individual.Denise Chrysler, Harry McGee, Janice Bach, Ed Goldman & Peter D. Jacobson - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (s1):98-101.
IRB review and public health biobanking: a case study of the Michigan BioTrust for Health.A. Mongoven & H. McGee - 2012 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (3):11-16.
Variability in the storage and use of newborn dried bloodspots in Canada: is it time for national standards?Denise Avard, Hilary Vallance, Cheryl Greenberg, Claude Laberge & Linda Kharaboyan - 2006 - Genomics, Society and Policy 2 (3):1-16.
Protecting communities in health research from exploitation.Segun Gbadegesin & David Wendler - 2006 - Bioethics 20 (5):248-253.
Individual risk and community benefit in international research.Robert C. Hughes - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):626-629.
A model of community substituted consent for research on the vulnerable.David C. Thomasma - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (1):47-57.
Justifying Community Benefit Requirements in International Research.Robert C. Hughes - 2012 - Bioethics 28 (8):397-404.
What Do the Various Principles of Justice Mean Within the Concept of Benefit Sharing?Bege Dauda, Yvonne Denier & Kris Dierickx - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (2):281-293.
Respecting Diversity, Respecting Complexity.Judith Andre - 2002 - Law Review of Michigan State University-Detroit College of Law 2002 (4):911-916.
Assuring Adequate Protections in International Health Research: A Principled Justification and Practical Recommendations for the Role of Community Oversight.David Buchanan, Sibusiso Sifunda, Nasheen Naidoo, Shamagonam James & Priscilla Reddy - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (3):246-257.
Ethics in Public and Community Health.Peter Bradley, Peter M. Bradley & Amanda Burls (eds.) - 1999 - Routledge.
Ethics in Public and Community Health.Peter Bradley, Peter M. Bradley & Amanda Burls (eds.) - 1999 - Routledge.
Involving Communities in Deciding What Benefits They Receive in Multinational Research.David Wendler & Seema Shah - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (5):584-600.
The role of community health advisors in community-based participatory research.Lachel Story, Agnes Hinton & Sharon B. Wyatt - 2010 - Nursing Ethics 17 (1):117-126.
The challenge of measuring community values in ways appropriate for setting health care priorities.Peter A. Ubel - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (3):263-284.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
27 (#588,912)

6 months
16 (#156,807)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Informed Consent, Body Property, and Self-Sovereignty.Radhika Rao - 2016 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (3):437-444.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references