Theory of protective empowering for balancing patient safety and choices

Nursing Ethics 18 (1):88-101 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Registered nurses in psychiatric-mental health nursing continuously balance the ethical principles of duty to do good (beneficence) and no harm (non-maleficence) with the duty to respect patient choices (autonomy). However, the problem of nurses’ level of control versus patients’ choices remains a challenge. The aim of this article is to discuss how nurses accomplish their simultaneous responsibility for balancing patient safety (beneficence and non-maleficence) with patient choices (autonomy) through the theory of protective empowering. This is done by reflecting on interview excerpts about caring from 17 registered nurses taking part in a grounded theory study conducted in three acute urban psychiatric hospital settings in Canada. The interplay between the protective and empowering dimensions of the theory of protective empowering was found to correspond with international, national, and local nursing codes of ethics and standards. The overall core process of protective empowering, and its associated reflective questions, is offered as a new lens for balancing patient safety with choices

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Empowering Patients is Good Medical Care.Jodi Halpern - 2013 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 20 (2):179-181.
Respect for Autonomy: Is It Always Paramount?Diane Morgan - 1996 - Nursing Ethics 3 (2):118-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
39 (#412,276)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?