Review of: Kaposy C. (2018) Choosing Down Syndrome [Book Review]

Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 2 (2):21-22 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

With the advent of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing, Chris Kaposy believes that more people should choose to parent children with Down Syndrome. Kaposy advocates for the Social Disability Model and recommends a normative pragmatic approach as standard. He makes use of both quantitative and qualitative evidence to support his position.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.7202/1058145ar

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review of: Kaposy C. (2018) Choosing Down Syndrome. [REVIEW]Meghan Chevalier - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics/Revue canadienne de bioéthique 2 (2):21-22.
Choosing Down Syndrome: Ethics and New Prenatal Testing TechnologiesChrisKaposyMIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2018, 240 pp, Hardcover, US$$27.95 pp. ISBN: 9780262037716. [REVIEW]Rivka Weinberg - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (8):976-977.
A Personal Experience of Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome.Chris Kaposy - 2013 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 3 (1):18-21.
A Disability Critique of the New Prenatal Test for Down Syndrome.Chris Kaposy - 2013 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 23 (4):299-324.
People with down syndrome - part of our community.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2012 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 18 (2):1.
When is the Promotion of Prenatal Testing for Selective Abortion Wrong?Javiera Perez Gomez - 2020 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 30 (1):71-109.
Prenatal Screening, Ethics and Down’s Syndrome: a literature review.Priscilla Alderson - 2001 - Nursing Ethics 8 (4):360-374.
At Home with Down Syndrome and Gender.Sophia Isako Wong - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (3):89-117.
At home with down syndrome and gender.Sophia Isako Wong - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (3):89-117.
Book review: Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch. Prenatal testing: A review of prenatal testing and disability rights, Washington, D.c.: Georgetown university press, 2000; and rayna Rapp. Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. [REVIEW]Mary Briody Mahowald - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (3):216-221.
Ideal Ethical Standards for Contraceptive Use.Francoise Baylis & Chris Kaposy - 2011 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33 (2):19-20.
Medical Professionals as Agents of Eugenics.Christopher M. Reilly - 2018 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 18 (2):237-246.
Motherhood in the Context of Normative Discourse: Birth Stories of Mothers of Children with Down Syndrome.Susan L. Gabel & Kathy Kotel - 2018 - Journal of Medical Humanities 39 (2):179-193.
A burden from birth? Non‐invasive prenatal testing and the stigmatization of people with disabilities.Giovanni Rubeis & Florian Steger - 2018 - Bioethics 33 (1):91-97.
For Your Interest? The Ethical Acceptability of Using Non‐Invasive Prenatal Testing to Test ‘Purely for Information’.Zuzana Deans, Angus J. Clarke & Ainsley J. Newson - 2014 - Bioethics 29 (1):19-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-18

Downloads
4 (#1,629,783)

6 months
4 (#799,214)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references