Abstract

The purpose of the article is to show multivector tactics of Ukrainian State in foreign policy which is based on two socio-political roots in the public mind, as well as prove the disruptiveness of present multivector policy. In general dualism in foreign policy is a natural reaction of the State on the processes of globalisation. The strategy of European integration and Eurasian desire are specified by mental peculiarities of the cityzens, living in different parts of Ukraine, and so by their politicians who hope to rebirth the country within the framework of one of the unions. In addition, the interaction with the EurAsEU is determined by the needs of the industrial South and East in the scientific-technical cooperation with equivalent partners, access to the markets of the Ukrainian products demand, and energy dependence. Ignoring of each vector in foreign policy can cause a massive protest. Economic dualism in foreign policy is productive. But mixing of political and economic aspects of moltivector policy is unacceptable. Multivector poicy sooner or later becomes disruptive because perceived in the world as tactics of state undecided according to global unions, as unreliable partner. Such a policy is a feacher of a semilegitimatestate, its dual political dependence on ideological preferences of different categories of voters. The tactic of «floating policy» creates distrust, reduction of economic relationship, the decrease of foreign policy efficiency to resolve domestic problems. The best way to change one and main partner in foreign vector iscreation of conditions for key branches of economy and real welfare of great part of the citizens.