The neo-mohist conception of bian (disputation)

Journal of Chinese Philosophy 26 (1):1-19 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1540-6253.1999.tb00529.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Dialectics: a controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge.Nicholas Rescher - 1977 - Albany: State University of New York Press.
Chinese Buddhist Religious Disputation.Mary M. Garrett - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (2):195-209.
More Mohist Marginalia: A Reply to Makeham on Later Mohist Canon and Explanation B 67.Chris Fraser - 2007 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy and Culture 2:227–59.
Renaissance man as logician: josse clichtove (1472–1543) on disputations.E. J. Ashworth - 1986 - History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (1):15-29.
Disputation and Logic in the Medieval Treatises De Modo Opponendi et Respondendi.Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe - 2011 - Vivarium 49 (1-3):127-149.
Xunzi as a Semantic Inferentialist: Zhengmin, Bian-Shuo and Dao-Li.Chung-I. Lin - 2011 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (3):311-340.
Associate Professor of Religion.Jane Geaney - 1999 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
The Neo-Liberal State.Raymond Plant - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Mohist canons.Chris Fraser - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
71 (#229,710)

6 months
10 (#261,437)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chaehyun Chong
Sogang University

Citations of this work

Mohist canons.Chris Fraser - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Distinctions, Judgment, and Reasoning in Classical Chinese Thought.Chris Fraser - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (1):1-24.
Mohist Approach To The Rule-following Problem.Chung-I. Lin - 2013 - Comparative Philosophy 4 (2):41-66.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references