M. Oakeshott's Thoughts on Political Education : Relationship to Neo - Confucianistic Theory

Journal of Moral Education 12 (2):101 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Michael Oakeshott on history, practice and political theory.T. Smith - 1996 - History of Political Thought 17 (4):591-614.
Contingency and Judgement in Oakeshott’s Political Thought.Bruce Haddock - 2005 - European Journal of Political Theory 4 (1):7-21.
Rationalism and tradition: The Popper–Oakeshott conversation.Struan Jacobs & Ian Tregenza - 2014 - European Journal of Political Theory 13 (1):3-24.
Abating contingency: Michael Oakeshott’s political pluralism.Sungmoon Kim - 2016 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (3):267-288.
The Cambridge companion to Oakeshott.Efraim Podoksik (ed.) - 2012 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neo - Confucianistic Theory of Education.Hong-Wo Lee - 2000 - Journal of Moral Education 12 (1):1.
Michael Oakeshott: An Introduction.Paul Franco - 2004 - Yale University Press.
The skeptic's Oakeshott.Steven Anthony Gerencser - 2000 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
Oakeshott, Berlin, and liberalism.Paul Franco - 2003 - Political Theory 31 (4):484-507.
Political Theory of M. Oakeshott and Education.Youngtae Cho - 2010 - The Journal of Moral Education 22 (1):1.
The Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott.Terry Nardin - 2001 - Pennsylvania State University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
10 (#1,217,423)

6 months
2 (#1,250,897)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references