Consistency in relativity

Foundations of Physics 6 (6):681-685 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The error in Kingsley's attack on special relativity is shown to arise from his failure to actually use the Lorentz transformation. He has instead applied a fallacious symmetry argument to justify the use of time dilation in a situation for which this special case formula is not valid

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The consistency of the postulates of special relativity.Ø Grøn & M. Nicola - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (6):677-680.
A note on relativity before Einstein.M. N. Macrossan - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (2):232-234.
Are probabilism and special relativity compatible?Nicholas Maxwell - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.
Special relativity.Albert Shadowitz - 1968 - Philadelphia,: Saunders Co..
Revised Robertson's test theory of special relativity.José G. Vargas - 1984 - Foundations of Physics 14 (7):625-651.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
21 (#736,702)

6 months
8 (#359,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references