Appropriation and commercialization of the Pasteur anthrax vaccine

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (4):722-742 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Whereas Pasteur patented the biotechnological processes that he invented between 1857 and 1873 in the agro-food domain, he did not file any patents on the artificial vaccine preparation processes that he subsequently developed. This absence of patents can probably be explained by the 1844 patent law in France that established the non-patentable status of pharmaceutical preparations and remedies, including those for use in veterinary medicine. Despite the absence of patents, the commercial exploitation of the anthrax vaccine in the 1880s and 1890s led to a technical and commercial monopoly by Pasteur’s laboratory as well as the founding of a commercial company to diffuse the vaccine abroad. Pasteur repeatedly refused to transfer his know-how and anthrax vaccine production methods to foreign laboratories, on the grounds that he wished to control the quality of the vaccines produced. Indeed, it was relatively difficult to transfer a method that was not yet perfectly stabilized in the early 1880s. Pasteur also wanted to maintain the monopoly of his commercial company and to increase the profits from vaccine sales so that the Institut Pasteur could be financially independent. The ‘Pasteur anthrax vaccine’ operating licences are described and analysed in detail in this article

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pasteur et le choléra des poules: révision critique d'un récit historique.Antonio Cadeddu - 1985 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 7 (1):87 - 104.
The 'experimental stable' of the BCG vaccine: safety, efficacy, proof, and standards, 1921–1933.Christian Bonah - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (4):696-721.
Pasteur et la vaccination contre le charbon: une analyse historique et critique.Antonio Cadeddu - 1987 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 9 (2):255 - 276.
La métaphore vaccine. De l'inoculation à la vaccinologie.Anne Marie Moulin - 1992 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 14 (2):271 - 297.
Ethically compromised vaccines in Australia.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2012 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 17 (3):1.
Pasteur et les philosophes / Pasteur and the philosophers.Patrice Pinet - 2004 - Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 57 (2):457-472.
Strategies of Research For a Vaccine Against AIDS.Max Essex - 1995 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 17 (1):141 - 149.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
46 (#346,019)

6 months
6 (#522,028)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

New wine in old bottles? The biotechnology problem in the history of molecular biology.Jean-Paul Gaudillière - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (1):20-28.

Add more citations