Reflections on Non-naturalized Necessity

Philo 7 (2):156-162 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modal properties are notorious epistemic trouble-makers. That theme is very much at the heart of Michael Rea’s thesis that the Discovery Problem (roughly, the problem of explaining how we know when ascriptions of modal properties are true) has no naturalistic resolution. That might encourage the thought that supernaturalism will somehow resolve the problem. This paper argues that supernaturalism is unlikely to offer a solution of the Discovery Problem.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A dilemma about necessity.Peter W. Hanks - 2008 - Erkenntnis 68 (1):129 - 148.
Modality and supervenience.Danilo Suster - 2000 - Acta Analytica 15:141-155.
Laws: Projectability and uniformity.G. M. K. Hunt - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (3):241 – 246.
Abduction and Modality.Stephen Biggs - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):283-326.
Evidential support, reliability, and Hume's problem of induction.Chris Tucker - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):503-519.
Life, death, and the hiddenness of God.Robert Oakes - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (3):155 - 160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-24

Downloads
54 (#295,023)

6 months
7 (#425,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Carter
Last affiliation: North Carolina State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references