Martial ‘in callimachvm’

Classical Quarterly 68 (2):603-611 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has the aim of bringing some fresh observations to the interpretation of a Martial epigram. Beyond the individual poem, it seeks to read Martial's poetics more broadly, particularly with regard to the presence of Greek avatars, of various kinds, in his poetic production. The strategy will be an exact reading of the literary avatars in 10.4, with an attempt to specify the tone with which individual writers are associated. Once this strategy is developed in the case of well-recognized intertextual models, it will be used to explore an underrated intertext in 10.4.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Greek epigram in the Roman Empire: Martial's forgotten rivals. [REVIEW]Luciano Floridi - 2007 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 100 (2):166-167.
Silenced Intertext: Pliny on Martial on Pliny.Ilaria Marchesi - 2013 - American Journal of Philology 134 (1):101-118.
Plagiarism and Poetic Identity in Martial.J. Mira Seo - 2009 - American Journal of Philology 130 (4):567-593.
Two problems in Martial.P. Watson & L. Watson - 1996 - Classical Quarterly 46 (02):586-.
Two problems in Martial.P. Watson & L. Watson - 1996 - Classical Quarterly 46 (2):586-591.
Martial on Patronage and Literature.R. P. Saller - 1983 - Classical Quarterly 33 (1):246-257.
Martial on Patronage and Literature.R. P. Saller - 1983 - Classical Quarterly 33 (01):246-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-10

Downloads
7 (#1,411,318)

6 months
1 (#1,515,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Recusatio-form und pindarode.Walter Wimmel - 1965 - Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Literatur Und Ihre Rezeption 109 (1-4):83-103.

Add more references