Les culs-de-sac of enlightenment aesthetics: A metaphilosophy of art

Metaphilosophy 40 (2):157-178 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: This article charts the rise and fall of the Modern System of the Arts and the failure of the aesthetic theory of art to define membership in the so-called system, which, instead, I argue, is and has been, for a long time, merely a historically evolved collection. Rather than endorsing the continued attempt to define Art with a capital A in terms of aesthetic experience, I recommend alternative lines of research for contemporary philosophers of the arts

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-perceptual aesthetic properties: Comments for James Shelley.Noël Carroll - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):413-423.
Culture and art: an anthology.Lars Aagaard-Mogensen (ed.) - 1976 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
Aesthetics.Harold Osborne - 1972 - London,: Oxford University Press.
Ideas about art.Kathleen Kadon Desmond - 2011 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Eighteenth-century aesthetics and the reconstruction of art.Paul Mattick (ed.) - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-16

Downloads
68 (#241,044)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Noel Carroll
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The aesthetic function of art.Gary Iseminger - 2004 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Edited by Kevin A. Stoehr.
The Aesthetic Function of Art.Gary Iseminger - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 4:169-176.

Add more references