Integrating cognitive and emotion paradigms to address the paradox of aging

Cognition and Emotion 33 (1):119-125 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTThirty years ago, the subfields of emotion and cognition operated relatively independently and the associated science reflected the tacit view that they were distinct constructs. Today, questions about the integration of cognition and emotion are among the most interesting questions in the field. I offer a personal view of the key changes that fuelled this shift over time and describe research from my group that unfolded in parallel and led to the identification of the positivity effect.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A case for qualitatively distinct emotion.John D. Richardson - 2007 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 27 (1):19-34.
The fiction of paradox: really feeling for Anna Karenina.Daniéle Moyal-Sharrock - 2009 - In Ylva Gustafsson, Camilla Kronqvist & Michael McEachrane (eds.), Emotions and understanding: Wittgensteinian perspectives. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Art and Emotion.Hichem Naar - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Emotion regulation and successful aging.Gaurav Suri & James J. Gross - 2012 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (8):409-410.
The Paradox of Suspense Realism.Christy Mag Uidhir - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69 (2):161-171.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-06

Downloads
17 (#872,959)

6 months
3 (#984,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?