Fatal Flaws in Michael Almeida’s Alleged ‘Defeat’ of Rowe’s New Evidential Argument from Evil

Philo 10 (1):85-90 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a previous issue of Philo, Michael Almeida claimed to have “defeated” William Rowe’s “New Evidential Argument from Evil” againstthe existence of a benevolent god. However, Almeida’s argument suffers from serious logical errors and even logical absurdities, leaving Rowe’s argument intact and quite unthreatened by anything Almeida argues.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rowe's evidential arguments from evil.Graham Oppy - 2013 - In Justin P. Mcbrayer (ed.), A Companion to the Problem of Evil. Wiley. pp. 49-66.
What no eye has seen: the skeptical theist response to Rowe's evidential argument from evil.Nick Trakakis - 2012 - Philo: The Journal of the Society of Humanist Philosophers 6 (2):250-266.
Rowe's Probabilistic Argument from Evil.Richard Otte - 2002 - Faith and Philosophy 19 (2):147-171.
Blocking Rowe's New Evidential Argument from Evil.Jeff Jordan - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (4):435-449.
Sceptical theism and evidential arguments from evil.Michael J. Almeida & Graham Oppy - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):496 – 516.
Surplus Evil.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40:78-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-24

Downloads
83 (#203,885)

6 months
8 (#370,373)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references