Evidence, Relevance and Warrant: In Defence of Voluntarism

In Claus Beisbart & Michael Frauchiger (eds.), Scientific Theories and Philosophical Stances: Themes from van Fraassen. De Gruyter. pp. 193-206 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does Roush show that evidence should be probable?Damien Fennell & Nancy Cartwright - 2009 - Centre for the Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Doxastic Voluntarism: A Sceptical Defence.Danny Frederick - 2013 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (1):24-44.
An old problem for the new rationalism.Yuval Avnur - 2011 - Synthese 183 (2):175-185.
Relativism, Absolutism, and Tolerance.Hye-Kyung Kim & Michael Wreen - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (4):447-459.
Premissary relevance.J. Anthony Blair - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):203-217.
Well‐Ordered Science: Evidence for Use.Nancy Cartwright - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):981-990.
Does Scepticism Presuppose Voluntarism?Jonathan Hill - 2018 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 8 (1):31-50.
Descartes and the Question of Direct Doxastic Voluntarism.Rico Vitz - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Research 35:107-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-18

Downloads
7 (#1,392,075)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nancy Cartwright
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations