Violence and the Unconditional

Journal for Continental Philosophy of Religion 1 (2):170-190 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I distinguish between the deep culture and the manifest culture, the relationship between the two constituting a circle, which constitutes the circulation of a radical theology of culture. The deep culture surfaces in the manifest, and the manifest draws upon the depths; neither one without the other. My hypothesis is that religion is an expression of the deep culture and for that reason, religion is not accidentally violent; religion is violent in virtue of something essential to religion. Religion is playing with the fire of the concealed depths, of the unconditional, of the impossible, of the undeconstructible. Religion is the best way to save the world, but it also the best way to burn it down. It is both of these things and in virtue of the same property. This is not to say that religion is structurally violent, always and necessarily violent. It is structurally ambiguous, dangerous, on the verge of violence, whipsawing between radical violence and radical non-violence, between martyrdom and murder. Religious beliefs are not the cause of the violence but often a façade for deeper, visceral nationalism or ethnic hatred, The reaction of Christian right to the contemporary world is naive and simplistic but not superficial; it reflects a visceral fear of the postmodern world. Religion is a matter of being claimed by something unconditional, which means it should have the good sense not to lay claim to it. We should never trust anything that has not passes through that apophasis. Before any claims we make, we are laid claim to in advance by the unconditional, the undeconstructible, which Schelling calls the prius, the “un-pre-thinkable”. The unconditional in the optimal sense is love, which is an expenditure made without the expectation of a return, like loving one’s enemies, which is impossible, the impossible. But love does not get a pass. What would we not do for love? In that question is concentrated all the ambiguity of love, all the courage of the martyr, but no less the violence of the suicide bomber.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The “Light of Light Beyond Light”.Carl Raschke - 2019 - Journal for Continental Philosophy of Religion 1 (2):258-276.
Unconditional Responsibility in the Face of Disastrous Violence.Burkhard Liebsch - 2019 - Journal for Continental Philosophy of Religion 1 (2):191-212.
Some Problems with Jacques Derrida’s Concept of Hospitality.Gerasimos Kakoliris - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 12:183-188.
Philosophy of Media: Is Violence Funny?Divna Vuksanović - 2018 - In Medias Res 7 (12):1821–1832.
Hope as Grounds for Forgiveness.Heidi Chamberlin Giannini - 2017 - Journal of Religious Ethics 45 (1):58-82.
Foucault’s Genealogy in War: A Creative Element of Violence.Katarzyna Dworakowska - 2019 - Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 3 (2):26-39.
Three Questions about Violence.Vittorio Bufacchi - 2022 - Washington University Review of Philosophy 2:209-218.
Unconditional Truth in Practice.Sam Page - 2006 - Contemporary Pragmatism 3 (1):37-50.
Overcoming Modernity and Violence.Gennady Shkliarevsky - 2015 - Cosmos and History 11 (1):299-314.
Expositions of Sacrificial Logic: Girard, Žižek, and Cormac McCarthy's No Country for Old Men.Benjamin Barber - 2013 - Contagion: Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture 20:163-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-17

Downloads
8 (#1,325,033)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Caputo
Syracuse University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references