The laws of non-bivalent probability

Logic and Logical Philosophy 15 (2):163-171 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Non-bivalent languages (languages containing sentences that can be true, false or neither) are given a probabilitistic interpretation in terms of betting quotients. Necessary and sufficient conditions for avoiding Dutch books—the laws of non-bivalent probability—in such a setting are provided

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Entailment and bivalence.Fred Seymour Michael - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (4):289-300.
Conditionals in reasoning.John Cantwell - 2009 - Synthese 171 (1):47 - 75.
Bivalence and the Sorites Paradox.John L. King - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1):17 - 25.
Multi-valued Semantics: Why and How.Arnon Avron - 2009 - Studia Logica 92 (2):163-182.
From finitary to infinitary second‐order logic.George Weaver & Irena Penev - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (5):499-506.
Classical logic and truth-value gaps.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1992 - Philosophical Papers 21 (2):141-150.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
53 (#309,121)

6 months
5 (#711,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Cantwell
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

Citations of this work

The Logic of Conditional Negation.John Cantwell - 2008 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 49 (3):245-260.
What we can learn from how trivalent conditionals avoid triviality.Daniel Lassiter - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (9-10):1087-1114.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Conditional probabilities and compounds of conditionals.Vann McGee - 1989 - Philosophical Review 98 (4):485-541.

Add more references