Consequences of pragmatic conceptualism: On the methodology problem in jurisprudence

Ratio Juris 22 (2):171-186 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to address some of the main issues of contemporary jurisprudential methodology by considering the contribution of Jules Coleman to this subject. After a description of Coleman's methodological approach and a clarification of its philosophical background, the paper focuses on some related problems, such as the relation between linguistic meaning and conceptual content, the nature of legal concepts, the different aspects of the normativity of content, and the revisability of conceptual truths.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-06-16

Downloads
39 (#410,656)

6 months
5 (#647,370)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Damiano Canale
Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi

Citations of this work

Legal concepts as inferential nodes and ontological categories.Giovanni Sartor - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (3):217-251.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
The concept of law.Hla Hart - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Law’s Empire.Ronald Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Articulating reasons: an introduction to inferentialism.Robert Brandom - 2000 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

View all 35 references / Add more references