E. M. Ureña, La critica Kantiana de la Sociedad y de la Religion. Kant, predecesor de Marx y Freud

Kant Studien 73 (1):90 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

UREÑA, E.M.: La crítica kantiana de la sociedad y de la religión.A. López Molina - 1979 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 14:73.
Enrique M. Urena, "La Teoria Critica de la Sociedad de habermas"; Victor Perez-Diza, "Estado, Burocracia y Sociedad Civil. Discusion Critica, Desarrallos y Alternativas a la Teoria Politica de Karl Marx".Jose Rodriguez-Ibanez - 1979 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 39.
Sobre el concepto de religión en Kant.Juan Burgos Velasco - 2005 - Paideia 26 (72):233-248.
REÑA, E. M.: "La crítica kantiana de la sociedad y de la religión". [REVIEW]A. M. López Molina - 1979 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 14:73.
La Teoria Critica de la Sociedad de Habermas: La Crisis de la Sociedad Industrializada.José Rodriguez-Ibanez - 1979 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1979 (39):218-221.
Il Pensiero Filosofico di E. Kant Ovvero Problemi di Critica Kantiana Logica Metafisica, Morale Ed Estetica Con Un 'Appendice Su Significato E Valore Attuale Della Pedagogia Kantiana.Vincenzo De Ruvo - 1969 - Cedam.
Alasdair Macintyre, Joven Lector De Freud.Rafael Barceló - 2010 - Isegoría 42:231-245.
O problema do universalismo estético em Kant e Bourdieu.Ricardo Barbosa - 2015 - Studia Kantiana 18:134-147.
Beyond the chains of illusion: my encounter with Marx and Freud.Erich Fromm - 1962 - New York: Continuum.
Naturalistic explanations of religion are as old as Xenophanes (570–480bc). The most famous are probably those of Feuerbach, Marx, and Freud. I must confess that I don't find these three famous explanations of religion very interesting. 1 Large parts of them are unintelligible (this is particularly true of Feuerbach's writings on religion) and the parts that are intelligible are vague and untestable (Feuerbach and Freud), or else they demand allegiance to some very comprehensive theory that has been tried and found wanting on grounds unrelated to religion (Marx's theory of the dialectics of history and Freud's psychology). [REVIEW]Peter van Inwagen - 2009 - In Jeffrey Schloss & Michael J. Murray (eds.), The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion. Oxford University Press.
Sentidos de metafísica na filosofia crítica de Kant.Diego Kosbiau Trevisan - 2014 - Studia Kantiana 17:104-125.
La Existencia y la fundamentación de la metafísica.V. Simian - 2011 - Ideas Y Valores 60 (147):113-141.
Marx, Freud, Spinoza: tre concezioni del transindividuale.Etienne Balibar - 2015 - Nóema 6 (1).
Kant, Freud, and the ethical critique of religion.James DiCenso - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (3):161 - 179.
La verdad está en juego: Adorno, Kant y la estética.Berta M. Pérez - 2009 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 26:237-272.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references