Sobre o gênio na estética de Schopenhauer

Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 11 (2):31-42 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Minha comunicação pretende apresentar um estudo da figura do gênio em Schopenhauer. A preocupação fundamental será a questão da especificidade da obra de arte em Schopenhauer como modo de conhecimento, a saber, “como metafísica do belo”. Nessa via analisaremos a característica própria do gênio em Schopenhauer, buscando estabelecer suas referências ao gênio em Kant, e questionando as afinidades e contrastes entre ambas as concepções. Trata-se de inquirir, por meio da filosofia da arte de Schopenhauer, se o gênio, na concepção pós-kantiana, guarda as mesmas características que as que lhe foram atribuídas por Kant na terceira Crítica. A intenção é a de pesquisar o alcance dessa questão diante da acusação de uma volta de Schopenhauer a uma posição pré-crítica.This presentation consists in a study on the notion of genius in Schopenhauer. To this purpose I concentrate attention on the specificity of the author’s conception of the work of art as a mode of knowledge, i.e., “as a metaphysics of beauty”. Within this scope I analyze the proper characteristic of genius in Schopenhauer’s philosophy, targeting to establish his references to genius as conceived by Kant. Such analysis makes it possible to consider the affinities and contrasts existing between both conceptions, which by its turn allow us to inquire – through Schopenhauer’s philosophy – whether the post-Kantian conception of genius preserves the characteristics that Kant attributed to it in the third Critique. My general intention is to explore the possibilities of this question as one of the keys to evaluate the accusation done to Schopenhauer that he would have retrogressed to a pre-critical position

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
4 (#1,630,023)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Maria Lucia Cacciola
University of São Paulo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant und Plato.Heinz Heimsoeth - 1965 - Kant Studien 56 (3-4):349-372.
Kant und Plato.H. Heimsoeth - 1966 - Société Française de Philosophie, Bulletin 56 (3):349.

Add more references