Autonomous Action: Self-Determination in the Passive Mode

Ethics 122 (4):647-691 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In order to be a self-governing agent, a person must govern the process by means of which she acquires the intention to act as she does. But what does governing this process require? The standard compatibilist answers to this question all assume that autonomous actions differ from nonautonomous actions insofar as they are a more perfect expression of the agent’s agency. I challenge this conception of autonomous agents as super agents. The distinguishing feature of autonomous agents is, I argue, the nonagential role they play in the formation of their intentions. I offer an account of the relevant role.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-25

Downloads
299 (#68,280)

6 months
30 (#106,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sarah Buss
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

Games and the art of agency.C. Thi Nguyen - 2019 - Philosophical Review 128 (4):423-462.
Self-expression: a deep self theory of moral responsibility.Chandra Sripada - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (5):1203-1232.
Personal autonomy.Sarah Buss - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Immigration and self-determination.Bas van der Vossen - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (3):270-290.

View all 27 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Health as a theoretical concept.Christopher Boorse - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):542-573.
Asymmetrical freedom.Susan Wolf - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (March):151-66.
Weakness of will.Sarah Buss - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (1):13–44.

View all 9 references / Add more references