Principled Objections and Sham Arguments: The Case of Capital Punishment

Philosophy and Rhetoric 32 (4):299 - 308 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sham arguments and capital punishment.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (2):3-6.
Retributivist arguments against capital punishment.Thom Brooks - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (2):188–197.
The Irrevocability of Capital Punishment.Benjamin S. Yost - 2011 - Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (3):321-340.
Human Dignity and Capital Punishment.Thomas W. Satre - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:233-250.
Desert, Justice and Capital Punishment.Patrick Lenta & Douglas Farland - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):273-290.
Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2012 - New York, NY: Routledge.
The Rationale of Punishment.Jeremy Bentham - 2009 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Edited by James T. McHugh.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
24 (#672,829)

6 months
5 (#694,932)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith Burgess-Jackson
University of Texas at Arlington

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references