Consistency, possibility, and Gödel: a reply to Pruss

Philosophical Studies 179 (12):3671-3677 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Alexander Pruss has given a quick argument against the claim that consistency is possibility using Gödel’s second incompleteness theorem. The argument does not distinguish metalanguage claims of consistency from object-language ones, rendering it unsound.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Possibility is not consistency.Alexander R. Pruss - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (9):2341-2348.
Two Types of Ontological Frame and Gödel’s Ontological Proof.Sergio Galvan - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2):147--168.
Reply to Gale and Pruss.John F. Post - 2004 - Philo 7 (1):114-121.
A gödelian ontological argument improved.Alexander R. Pruss - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (3):347-353.
Domination and the Free Will Defense.Daniel Speak - 2015 - Faith and Philosophy 32 (3):313-324.
Infinity, Causation, and Paradox.Alexander R. Pruss - 2018 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment.Alexander R. Pruss - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Herbrand consistency of some arithmetical theories.Saeed Salehi - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (3):807-827.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-10

Downloads
54 (#302,463)

6 months
18 (#152,495)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Computability and Logic.George S. Boolos, John P. Burgess & Richard C. Jeffrey - 2003 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (4):520-521.
Possibility is not consistency.Alexander R. Pruss - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (9):2341-2348.

Add more references