A Note On Lucretius, De Rerum Natura 3.361

Classical Quarterly 64 (1):413-417 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A conjecture made by Lambinus in 1565 proposes replacement of difficilest at 3.361 with desiperest. Although commonly printed until the end of the nineteenth century , in the twentieth century the conjecture fell out of favour, both in editions of the entire De rerum natura and of Book 3; the manuscript reading of difficilest has been kept by editors since 1900: Duff, Bailey, Martin, Kenney, Müller, Smith and Brown. But with this consensus there are problems, and there are several reasons for preferring Lambinus' conjecture

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
5 (#1,557,834)

6 months
1 (#1,508,411)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex.J. P. Elder & J. Martin - 1956 - American Journal of Philology 77 (2):191.

Add more references