Knowledge and Scepticism [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 38 (3):671-673 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Odegard's purpose is twofold: "to describe an ideal form of the knowledge of truth," and to "defend the view that such an ideal is realistic." While his description of knowledge is rooted in ordinary language, it is not bound by it; he reshapes ordinary language when necessary. The description includes those elements that are the necessary and sufficient conditions for an ideal knowledge. Odegard argues for its realism by giving an apologetic response to a sceptic. Accordingly the book is divided into two parts. Part 1 is a description of the ideal form of the knowledge of truth, and Part 2 is a defense of this ideal against attacks by the sceptic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scepticism, knowledge, and forms of reasoning.John Koethe - 2005 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Self-knowledge and scepticism.Jeff Malpas - 1994 - Erkenntnis 40 (2):165-184.
Scepticism and absurdity.Ingemund Gullvåg - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):163-190.
Scepticism, epistemic luck, and epistemic angst.Duncan Pritchard - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):185 – 205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
29 (#555,479)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references