On Bohr's response to EPR: A quantum logical analysis [Book Review]

Foundations of Physics 19 (7):793-805 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bohr's complementarity interpretation is represented as the relativization of the quantum mechanical description of a system to the maximal Boolean subalgebra (in the non-Boolean logical structure of the system) selected by a classically described experimental arrangement. Only propositions in this subalgebra have determinate truth values. The concept of a minimal revision of a Boolean subalgebra by a measurement is defined, and it is shown that the nonmaximal measurement of spin on one subsystem in the spin version of the Einstein—Podolsky—Rosen experiment actually selects an appropriate maximal Boolean subalgebra ℛ′ in the logical structure of the composite system, via a minimal revision of the maximal Boolean subalgebra & associated with the preparation of the singlet spin state. This provides an explanation for the determinate truth values of propositions in ℛ′ referring to the second subsystem within the framework of the complementarity interpretation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Bohr's response to EPR: II. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Bub - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (8):929-941.
Quantum logic, conditional probability, and interference.Jeffrey Bub - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):402-421.
Quantum mechanics without the projection postulate.Jeffrey Bub - 1992 - Foundations of Physics 22 (5):737-754.
On the structure of quantal proposition systems.Jeffrey Bub - 1994 - Foundations of Physics 24 (9):1261-1279.
Definable sets in Boolean ordered o-minimal structures. II.Roman Wencel - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (1):35-51.
Bell’s Correlations and Spin Systems.Martin Bohata & Jan Hamhalter - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (8):1065-1075.
The Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox re-examined.David H. Sharp - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):225-233.
Why the Afshar experiment does not refute complementarity.Ruth Kastner - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (4):649-658.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
89 (#195,225)

6 months
13 (#218,677)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey Bub
University of Maryland, College Park

Citations of this work

On Bohr's response to EPR: II. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Bub - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (8):929-941.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Autobiographical Notes.Max Black, Albert Einstein & Paul Arthur Schilpp - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):157.
Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist.Stephen Toulmin - 1950 - Science and Society 14 (4):353-360.
Quantum logic, conditional probability, and interference.Jeffrey Bub - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):402-421.

Add more references