“Fair” outcomes without morality in cleaner wrasse mutualism

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):83-84 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Baumard et al. propose a functional explanation for the evolution of a sense of fairness in humans: Fairness preferences are advantageous in an environment where individuals are in strong competition to be chosen for social interactions. Such conditions also exist in nonhuman animals. Therefore, it remains unclear why fairness (equated with morality) appears to be properly present only in humans

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Not all mutualism is fair, and not all fairness is mutualistic.Alex Shaw & Joshua Knobe - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):100 - 101.
Mutualism is only a part of human morality.Herbert Gintis - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):91-91.
Common Sense Morality versus Role Morality.Ján Kalajtzidis - 2012 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 2 (3-4):133-143.
Luck, Risk and the Market.Hugh Lazenby - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):667-680.
Praying for known outcomes.Tim Mawson - 2007 - Religious Studies 43 (1):71-87.
The evolution of morality.Douglas Allchin - 2009 - Evolution 2 (4):590-601.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
19 (#802,800)

6 months
8 (#368,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references