Stoic “undemonstrables” and indirect-deduction theorems

Bulletin of the Section of Logic 23 (2):53-60 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Indirect-deduction theorems.S. J. Surma - 1967 - Studia Logica 20 (1):164-166.
Logic: The Stoics (Part Two).Susanne Bobzien - 1999 - In Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes & et al (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Algebraic aspects of deduction theorems.Janusz Czelakowski - 1985 - Studia Logica 44 (4):369 - 387.
Local deductions theorems.Janusz Czelakowski - 1986 - Studia Logica 45 (4):377 - 391.
Deduction theorems for weak implicational logics.M. W. Bunder - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (2-3):95 - 108.
Stoic Syllogistic.Susanne Bobzien - 1996 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14:133-92.
Deduction theorems for RM and its extensions.Marek Tokarz - 1979 - Studia Logica 38 (2):105 - 111.
Argumentative aspects of indirect proof.James Gasser - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (1):41-49.
Stoic Logic.Susanne Bobzien - 2003 - In Brad Inwood (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Note on Deduction Theorems in contraction‐free logics.Karel Chvalovský & Petr Cintula - 2012 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 58 (3):236-243.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
19 (#804,284)

6 months
3 (#984,149)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references