What is consciousness for, anyway?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):206-207 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consciousness and self-consciousness.Uriah Kriegel - 2004 - The Monist 87 (2):182-205.
Is 'consciousness' ambiguous?Michael V. Antony - 2001 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (2):19-44.
Shades of consciousness.Roderic A. Girle - 1996 - Minds and Machines 6 (2):143-57.
Cortical models and the neurological gap.Bruce Bridgeman - 1998 - Consciousness and Cognition 7 (2):157-158.
Th e Elements of Consciousness and Their Neurodynnamic Correlates.Bruce J. MacLennan - 1996 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (5-6):409-424.
Consciousness-based education: a foundation for teaching and learning in the academic disciplines.Dara Llewellyn & Craig Pearson (eds.) - 2011 - Fairfield, Iowa 52557: Consciousness-Based Books, Maharishi University of Management.
Free will and the functions of consciousness.Bruce Bridgeman - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):540-540.
Theories of consciousness.David Papineau - 2003 - In Quentin Smith & Aleksandar Jokic (eds.), Consciousness: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 353.
Editorial.William P. Banks, Bruce Bridgeman, James T. Enns & Antti Revonsuo - 2009 - Consciousness and Cognition 18 (1):1.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
30 (#533,027)

6 months
6 (#520,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Principles of Psychology.William James - 1890 - London, England: Dover Publications.
A Materialist Theory of the Mind.D. M. Armstrong - 1968 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Ted Honderich.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.

View all 124 references / Add more references